The Jewish community has always looked upon marriage as a sacred and divine institution. It is viewed as a holy covenant between a man and a woman, a necessity for the divine plan to propagate the human race (Gen. 1:28), and so important that even the study of the Torah could be put aside to celebrate with and bring joy to a newly married couple.
Statements from Jewish sources capture the importance of marriage in the Jewish community. The Talmud says, “One who does not have a wife lives without joy, without bliss, without happiness.” The sages said, “One who dwells without a wife is as one who dwells without blessing.” Rashi, the great 11th-century biblical and talmudic scholar and rabbi, said, “A woman has no security until she marries.” Marriage is seen as necessary to basic, healthy living (Gen. 2:18).
In the Bible God gave Israel a number of safeguards and requirements concerning marriage. Some of these can be seen in the relationship and marriage of Ruth and Boaz.
Ruth was a Moabitess—a Gentile—who married into the family of Naomi when she wed Mahlon, the son of Naomi and her deceased husband Elimelech. Sometime after the marriage Mahlon died, and Ruth was left a widow with no children.
Ruth had obviously learned of the God of Israel from her new family, and her commitment to Him was genuine, as evidenced by her statement to Naomi, “thy people shall be my people, and thy God, my God” (1:16). This was in response to Naomi’s insistence that Ruth stay with her own people after the death of Mahlon, while Naomi returned to Israel and her people.
Jewish tradition tells us that Ruth was the daughter of Eglon, king of Moab. According to the Midrash, her beauty was outstanding “as that of a young girl,” even though she was about 40 years of age. Her character was impeccable, and humility and modesty were among her greatest virtues.
Unknown to Ruth, God had already provided for her welfare in the laws of marriage that were established in the Mosaic system. The unfolding of the story in the Book of Ruth shows us the matchless grace of our God.
Boaz was a man of great wealth and influence in the community of Israel (2:1; 4:1–2). It is believed by the rabbis that he was a member of the Sanhedrin, the ruling body of Israel. Boaz was recognized as a very generous and gracious man, as illustrated by his concern and provision for Ruth.
Boaz was recognized as a very generous and gracious man, as illustrated by his concern and provision for Ruth.
Boaz was a kinsman of Naomi’s deceased husband Elimelech. Although the Bible does not tell us his specific relationship to Elimelech, Jewish tradition suggests that he was Elimelech’s nephew and therefore the cousin of Mahlon (Boaz’s father being the brother of Elimelech).
Boaz was from the city of Bethlehem in Judah and was believed to be much older than Ruth. According to the rabbis, Boaz was about 80 years of age when he married Ruth. He is believed to have been a widower with no children at the time of their marriage.
God provided for the childless widow in the Old Testament through what is referred to as Levirate marriage.
If brethren dwell together, and one of them die, and have no child, the wife of the dead shall not marry outside the family unto a stranger; her husband’s brother shall go in unto her, and take her to him as his wife, and perform the duty of an husband’s brother to her. And it shall be, that the first-born whom she beareth shall succeed in the name of his brother who is dead, that his name be not put out of Israel (Dt. 25:5–6).
A man was required to marry his deceased brother’s childless wife, raise up a child, and thereby perpetuate the name of the deceased in Israel.
When it was discovered that Boaz was a near relative of Mahlon, Naomi rejoiced that God had provided a potential husband for Ruth (2:20). She then put into motion a plan to get Boaz to fulfill his responsibility to Ruth.
It is likely that the marriage of Ruth and Boaz was not technically a Levirate marriage as outlined in Deuteronomy 25. In a Levirate marriage, a brother was commanded to marry the widow; Boaz was a cousin, not a brother. Yet it is probable that the custom of raising up an offspring by a near relative was present in Israel before this command was given in the Law of Moses (see the account of Judah and Tamar in Genesis 38).
Deuteronomy 25:7–10 records a ceremony known as Chalitzah, which is performed for a man who refuses to fulfill his obligation of Levirate marriage.
And if the man desire not to take his brother’s wife, then let his brother’s wife go up to the gate unto the elders, and say, My husband’s brother refuseth to raise up unto his brother a name in Israel; he will not perform the duty of my husband’s brother. Then the elders of his city shall call him, and speak unto him; and if he stand to it, and say, I desire not to take her, Then shall his brother’s wife come unto him in the presence of the elders, and loose his shoe from off his foot, and spit in his face, and shall answer and say, So shall it be done unto that man who will not build up his brother’s house. And his name shall be called in Israel, The house of him who hath his shoe loosed.
When Ruth went to Boaz, lay at his feet during the night, and uncovered his feet (3:4, 7), it is believed that she was reminding him of his responsibility as a kinsman-redeemer to fulfill his obligation to marry her. The uncovering of his feet is believed to be an allusion to the Chalitzah ceremony.
Boaz recognized his responsibility; but he also knew that there was another man who was a closer kinsman than he (3:12–13). If the nearer kinsman wouldn’t fulfill his duty, Boaz was willing to marry Ruth and raise up seed.
The Nearer Kinsman
In chapter 4, verses 1 and 2, Boaz called the nearer kinsman to the gate of the city and asked for ten elders to join them to be public witnesses to the encounter. Boaz asked the nearer kinsman if he would
First, if he were already married with children, his inheritance would have been ruined with another wife and children. Second, a Jewish person was not to marry a Gentile (Dt. 7:2–3). Perhaps the nearer kinsman felt that marriage to Ruth, a Gentile, would mar his inheritance. Third, being a Moabite, Ruth and her offspring were prohibited from entering the congregation of the Lord (Dt. 23:3–4). Whatever the reason, the nearer kinsman declined to fulfill his obligation as the kinsman-redeemer.
The ceremony that followed this decision (4:7–11) is often said to be the ceremony of Chalitzah; however, a number of factors indicate that it probably was not that ceremony. First, Ruth was not even present—only Boaz was there. Second, Boaz took off his shoe and gave it to the near kinsman, instead of Ruth removing the shoe of the near kinsman. Third, Ruth did not spit in the face of the near kinsman. Fourth, Boaz purchased the right of redemption. In the Chalitzah, that right was taken rather than purchased.
What probably took place was an ancient custom of releasing a man from his obligation. Speaking of this event, H. H. Rowley says, “The drawing off of the shoe here signified the abandonment of the obligation resting on the kinsman in respect of the property and in respect of Ruth, and it clearly opened the way for Boaz to do what he could not else have done.”
Out of this union came the Messianic line, and, thereby, Ruth had the blessing of being a Gentile woman in the lineage of Jesus the Messiah.
Boaz then fulfilled the obligation of kinsman-redeemer by marrying Ruth and raising up seed with her to perpetuate the name of Mahlon, as required by the Law (4:10). Out of this union came the Messianic line, and, thereby, Ruth had the blessing of being a Gentile woman in the lineage of Jesus the Messiah.
Portrait of the Messiah
In the Jewish Scriptures, events are recorded that are shadows or pictures of truths or events presented in the New Testament. Many of these prophetic events were fulfilled in the person of the Messiah (Col. 2:15–17). Such an event in the Jewish Scriptures is referred to as a “type.” The fulfillment in the New Testament is the “anti-type.”
The Bible records numerous types: The Passover in the Jewish Scriptures (type, Ex. 12) is fulfilled in the New Testament in Jesus, the Passover Lamb (anti-type, 1 Cor. 5:6–8). Melchizedek (type, Gen. 14) relates to Jesus in the priesthood according to the order of Melchizedek (anti-type, Heb. 7). Jonah and the fish (type, Jon. 2) are related to Jesus’ resurrection (anti-type, Mt. 12:40). The Day of Atonement (type, Lev. 16) is fulfilled in Jesus, our High Priest (anti-type, Heb. 9). Many other clear examples of typology could be shown. Also, some events in the Old Testament not specifically recognized as types are nonetheless clear types of New Testament events. Although we must exercise care in this area in order not to develop fanciful pictures, we are fully justified in labeling an event in the Old Testament a type if there is a clear parallel in a New Testament event. The story of Ruth and Boaz fits this criterion.
Explanations are given of how Boaz could marry a Gentile woman—a Moabitess—without breaking the commands of the Law. Without detailing these explanations or their possible accuracy, let me suggest a reason for the series of events that led to the marriage of Ruth and Boaz.
Boaz was a Jewish man who undoubtedly possessed and exhibited grace and compassion. His concern and care for Ruth exemplified this fact. Ruth mentioned the grace or favor she found in Boaz’s eyes: “Then she fell on her face, and bowed herself to the ground, and said unto him, Why have I found grace in thine eyes, that thou shouldest take knowledge [notice] of me, seeing I am a foreigner?” (2:10). There was no reason for Boaz to have responded so favorably to this Gentile woman. It went against all that he believed, as revealed in the Law. Yet he had compassion and mercy on her to the extent that he did everything he could to redeem her and provide for her through marriage.
This is quite possibly the clearest picture in the Old Testament of the Messiah’s love for the Gentiles and His church. Gentiles were “without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world” (Eph. 2:12).
Ruth is a picture of the Gentiles (and, in a greater sense, both Jews and Gentiles) who have lost their inheritance. Sin has ruined our right of inheritance and separated us from God (Rom. 7:9–14). We have no right or ability to redeem what we have lost. Ruth was in exactly this condition.
Boaz is a picture of Jesus the Messiah. Boaz alone met all the requirements of the kinsman-redeemer. Jesus alone meets all of the requirements of our Kinsman Redeemer. Boaz showed favor toward Ruth, redeemed her, and restored her inheritance. Jesus showed favor toward us, redeemed us, and restored our lost inheritance (Eph. 2:13–22). A Jewish Messiah took to Himself a predominantly Gentile bride. All—Jew or Gentile—who are redeemed in this age are the bride of the Messiah (Eph. 5:22–33).
A portrait of the Messiah and His gracious love is clearly seen in the lives of Ruth and Boaz. It is truly a picture of His love for you and me. Just as Boaz willingly redeemed and restored Ruth to her full inheritance, so Jesus the Messiah wants to do the same for you. Will you enter into marriage with Him? To do so, you must be willing to say, “I do.”
Mark Robinson is the former Western States Director for The Friends of Israel.